The Reliability of EMG Parameters During Walking on the Stairs and an Inclined Surface

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master of Medical Engineering - Biomechanics.Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Sahand Industrial University, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Biomechanics.Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Sahand Industrial University, Tabriz, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Biomechanics.Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Sahand Industrial University, Tabriz, Iran.

4 Ph.D. Student of Biomechanics.Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Sahand Industrial University, Tabriz, Iran.

5 Professor of Physiotherapy.Department of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objective: The use of electromyography (EMG) parameters depends on their reliability. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of common EMG parameters recorded from muscles of lower extremity during walking on the stairs and an inclined surface.
Subjects and Methods: Fourteen healthy young males went up the stairs and an inclined surface with normal speed and after 30s rest went down. This was repeated 5 times with 1 min intervals. At the same time, surface EMG of rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and tibialis anterior muscles were recorded. In time domain, integrated EMG (IEMG) and root mean square of EMG (RMS), and in frequency domain, median frequency (MF) and mean power frequency (MPF) were calculated. Intra-class correlation coefficients and standard error of measurement for each parameter were calculated.
Results: The average relative and normalized absolute reliability of iEMG and RMS were higher than MF and MPF. The average relative and normalized absolute reliability in going up were better than going down. In overall, there was no difference between the reliability of RMS and IEMG and also between MF and MPF.
Conclusion: Differed reliability of EMG parameters in various movement conditions emphasizes the need to have reliability measures for all parameters of each muscle in conducting researches.

Keywords

References

1-Oskouei AH, Paulin MG, Carman AB. Intra-session and inter-day reliability of forearm surface EMG during varying hand grip forces. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2013; 23: 216-22.
2-Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4th edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
3-Carius D, Kugler P, Kuhwald HM, Wollny R. Absolute and relative intrasession reliability of surface EMG variables for voluntary precise forearm movements. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2015; 25(6): 860-9.
4-Larsson B, Karlsson S, Eriksson M, Gerdle B. Test–retest reliability of EMG and peak torque during repetitive maximum concentric knee extensions. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2003; 13: 281-7.
5-Mathur S, Eng JJ, MacIntyre D. Reliability of surface EMG during sustained contractions of the quadriceps. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2005;15(1): 102-10.
6-Smoliga JM, Myers JB, Redfern MS, Lephart SM. Reliability and precision of EMG in leg, torso, and arm muscles during running. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.  2010; 20(1): e1-9.
7-Kamen G, Gabriel DA. Essentials of electromyography. United States of America: Human Kinetics, 2010.
8-Sreter FA, Luff AR, Gergely J. Effect of cross-reinnervation on physiological parameters and on properties of myosin and sarcoplasmic reticulum of fast and slow muscles of the rabbit. The Journal of general physiology. 1975; 66(6): 811-21.
9-Iacono CU. Test–retest reliability of static EMG scan configural profiling. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. 2004; 29(1): 35-50.
10-Basmajian JV, DeLuca CJ. Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. 5th edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1985.
11-Brown WF. The physiological and technical basis of electromyography. Elsevier Science; 2013.
12-Soderberg GL, Cook TM. Electromyography in biomechanics. Physical Therapy. 1984; 64: 1813-20.
13-Davis JF. Manual of surface electromyography. Ohio: Aerospace Medical Laboratory; 1959.
14-Cram JR, Kasman GS, Holtz J. Introduction to surface electromyography. Aspen publishers; 1998.
15-DeLuca CJ. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. Journal of applied biomechanics. 1997; 13: 135-63.
16-Farina D, Merletti R, Stegeman D. Biophysics of the generation of EMG signals. Electromyography: physiology, engineering, and noninvasive applications. 2004: 81-105.
17-Dvir E, Lobetti RG, Jacobson LS, Pearson J, Becker PJ. Electrocardiographic changes and cardiac pathology in canine babesiosis. Journal of Veterinary Cardiology. 2004; 6:  15-23.
18-Iacono CU. EMG scanning norms: Caveat emptor. Biofeedback and self-regulation. 1991; 16: 227-41.
19-Callaghan MJ, McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA. The reliability of surface electromyography to assess quadriceps fatigue during multi joint tasks in healthy and painful knee. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2009; 19: 172-80.
20-Ltd, M. E. MegaWin 3.0 Software User Manual ME6000. Microkatu. Finland , 2004. Megawin. Available at: www.megaemg.com
21 Iranian national building policy, 12th chapter: occupational safety and protection, Home and Building deputy of the ministry of roads and urban development, 2009
22-Criswell E. Cram's introduction to surface electromyography. 2nd edition. United States of America: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2010.
23-Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2005; 19: 231-40.
 
Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal
Volume 16, Issue 3 - Serial Number 108
September and October 2017
Pages 307-316

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 January 2017
  • Revise Date: 31 May 2017
  • Accept Date: 28 June 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics