Comparison of Acoustic Features of High-Low vowels with Perceptual Speech Intelligibility in Normal and Adults with Parkinson

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Speech Therapy, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science,Ahvaz, Iran..

2 Department of Speech Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Neurology, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

4 Health Promotion Research Center, University of Medical Science, Zahedan, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objecitve: Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a progressive disease resulting from a reduction in the release of dopamine. This loss of dopamine can have an effect on non- speech movements, as well as various aspects of speech production. Dysarthria is a collective name for a group of speech disorders resulting from disturbance in muscular control over the speech mechanism due to damage to the central or peripheral nervous system. It produces problems in oral communication due to paralysis, weakness or incoordination of the speech musculature. A synthesis of research on normal and neurologically disordered speech should lead to an improved understanding of the neural regulation of speech.
Subjects and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 36 voice samples in normal voiceless environment were recorded. Frequency difference in high and low vowels was measured by Praat software. Data analysis was performed by Independent Samples Test and Maan-Whiteny tests.
Results: Allvariables showed significant differences.F1-F0in low vowels were significantly decreased in adults with Parkinson (P< 0.001). F2-F1 in high vowels was significantly decreased in adults with Parkinson (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results showed that Parkinson disease affects formant frequency. 

Keywords

References

1-Schulz GM, Grant MK. Effects of speech therapy and pharmacologic and surgical treatments on voice and speech in Parkinson's disease: a review of the literature. J Commun Disord 2000;33(1):59-88.
2-Goberman AM, Elmer LW. Acoustic analysis of clear versus conversational speech in individuals with Parkinson disease. J Commun Disord 2005;38(3):215-30.
3-Ziegler W, Hoole P, Hartmann E, von Cramon D. Accelerated speech in dysarthria after acquired brain injury: acoustic correlates. Br J Disord Commun 1988;23(3):215-28.
4-Kent RD, Kent JF, Weismer G, Duffy JR. What dysarthrias can tell us about the neural control of speech. J Phonetics 2000;28(3):273-302.
5-Richter S, Schoch B, Ozimek A, Gorissen B, Hein-Kropp C, Kaiser O, et al. Incidence of dysarthria in children with cerebellar tumors: a prospective study. Brain Lang 2005;92(2):153-67.
6-Kent RD, Weismer G, Kent JF, Rosenbek JC. Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria. J Speech Hear Disord 1989;54(4):482-99.
7-Kent RD. Intelligibility in speech disorders: theory, measurement and management. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1992.
8-Kent RD, Weismer G, Kent JF, Vorperian HK, Duffy JR. Acoustic studies of dysarthric speech: methods, progress, and potential. J Commun Disord 1999;32(3):141-80.
9-Miller N, Allcock L, Jones D, Noble E, Hildreth AJ, Burn DJ. Prevalence and pattern of perceived intelligibility changes in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78(11):1188-90.
10-Bunton K, Weismer G. The relationship between perception and acoustics for a high-low vowel contrast produced by speakers with dysarthria. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44(6):1215-28.
11-Kent RD, Vorperian HK, Kent JF, Duffy JR. Voice dysfunction in dysarthria: application of the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program. J Commun Disord 2003;36(4):281-306.
12-Kent RD. Vocal tract acoustics. J Voice 1993;7(2):97-117.
Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal
Volume 12, Issue 4 - Serial Number 85
July and August 2013
Pages 385-392

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 June 2011
  • Revise Date: 02 January 2013
  • Accept Date: 14 January 2013

Share

How to cite

Statistics