Determination of Mercury Attenuation Coefficient for Mercury Shielding for Radiotherapy Patients

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Department of Medical Physics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.

3 Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

4 Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Tehran, University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

5 Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objective:  The aim of radiotherapy is deliver enough doses to the tumor and protecting organs at risk that are around the tumor. In order to get appropriate dose distribution one can use radiation modifiers and compensators. So knowing attenuation coefficient of absorbers is necessary for treatment calculations.
Materials and Methods: In this study mercury was introduced as suitable material for radiotherapy shielding. A new method is presented by physics of interaction of photon with matter and complex integration calculation to calculate attenuation coefficient for any material with different thickness and energies.
Results: Radiation quality changes with thickness of absorber and this variation were significant. However, changes in field sizes did not produce any significant variations.
Conclusions: Variation of attenuation coefficient with thickness of absorber can not be ignored and it is necessary for accurate radiotherapy treatment. On the other hand using one number as an attenuation coefficient for radiotherapy compensators or modifiers is not accurate enough and variation of attenuation coefficient with thickness of absorber must be considered in radiotherapy treatment planning systems.

Keywords

References

 
1-Johns HE, Cunningham JR. The physics of Radiology. 4th ed. Springfield: Thomas; 1983.
2-National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Structural Shielding design and evaluation for megavoltage x- and gamma-ray radiotherapy facilities: recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Bethesda: NCRPM; 2005. (NCRP report; no 151)
3-Khan FM. The physics of radiation therapy.4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wikins; 2010.
4-Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM. Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients from 1 KeV to 20meV for elements z=1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest. NISTIR. 1995;5632:1-79.
5-Teli MT, Nathuram R, Mahajan CS. Single-experiment simultaneous-measurement of elemental mass attenuation coefficients of hydrogen,  Carbon and Oxygen for 0.123-1.33 MeV gamma rays. Radiat Meas 2000;32:329-33.
6-Midgley SM. A parameterization scheme for the x-ray linear attenuation coefficient and energy absorption coefficient. Phys Med Biol 2004;49(2):307-25.
7-Midgley SM. Materials analysis using x-ray linear attenuation coefficient measurements at four photon energies. Phys Med Biol 2005;50(17):4139-57.
8-Akkurt I, Mavi B, Akkurt A, Basyigit C, Kilincarslan S, Yalim HA. Study on Z-dependence of partial and total mass attenuation coefficients. J Quant Spectrosc Ra 2005;94:379-85.
9-Croft S. Observations on the experimental determination of mass attenuation coefficients. Ann Nucl Energy 2006;33:466-71.
10-Han I, Demir L, Sahin M. Determination of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic and electron numbers for some natural minerals. Radiat Phys Chem 2009;78:760-4.
11-Alles J, Mudde RF. Beam hardening: analytical considerations of the effective attenuation coefficient of x-ray tomography. Med Phys 2007;34:2882-9.
12-Du Plessis FCP, Willemse CA. Monte Carlo calculation of effeective attenuation coefficient for various compensator materials. Med Phys 2003;30(9):2537-43.
13-         Park JM, Kim J, Choi CH, Chie EK, Kim IH, Ye SJ. Photon energy-modulated radiotherapy: Monte Carlo simulation and treatment planning study. Radiat Ther Phy 2012;39(3):1265-77
14-International Atomic Energy Agency. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. New York: IAEA; 2004. (Technical Report; 398)
15-Ali ESM, Rogers DW. Functional forms for photon spectra of clinical linacs. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:31-50.
16-         Brouwer WF, Kazem I, van Mil CJ. Four years experience with a mercury shielded irregular field system (MSIFS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984;10(2):225-9.
17-Nelldal P. Design of a dynamic beam intensity modulator for radiation therapy [dissertation]. Stockholm: Univ. Stockholm; 2005.
18-X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients-Mercury [database on the Internet]. NIST [Serial Online] 2012;Vol???: Page number. Available from: http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/ElemTab.
19-Oguchi H, Obata Y. Commissioning of modulator-based IMRT with XiO treatment planning system. Med Phys 2009;36(1):261-9.
 
of absorber, radiotherapy.
Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal
Volume 12, Issue 3 - Serial Number 84
July and August 2013
Pages 269-278

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 September 2012
  • Revise Date: 19 January 2013
  • Accept Date: 03 February 2013

Share

How to cite

Statistics