Dose Enhancement Due to Injection of 79Au, 64Ga, 26Fe and 22Ti Nanoparticles into Tumor During HDR- 192Ir Brachytherapy Treatment: Monte Carlo Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Density, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objective:  On the base of photon interactions with material, increase of atomic number and decrease of emitted photon energy increases photoelectric absorption. In the current study, the dose enhancement factor (DEF) of loaded tumor with nanoparticles (NPs) was studied using 192Ir HDR brachytherapy source.
Subjects and Methods: Monte Carlo calculations were performed with MCNP4C code to determine the DEF from 192Ir source. The NPs-water mixture model was simulated. Uniform distribution of NPs into the tumor volume located 1.5 cm from center of source centered in the water phantom with 7, 18 and 30 mgr/gr concentrations of 79Au, 64Ga, 26Fe and 22Ti, was considered.
Result: DEF of 1.049, 1.122, 1.201 and 1.033, 1.083 and 1.136 were estimated for 79Au and 64Gd with concentrations of 7, 18 and 30 mgr/gr, respectively. Increasing of tumor doses was not significant due to loading of 26Fe and 22Ti. Increase the radial distance of source from the tumor (from 1.5 to 5 cm) increases the DEF (up to 22.3%). 
Conclusion: Our data predicate that loading of tumor with high-Z NPs such as gold NPs increase the absorbed dose of tumor irradiated to 192Ir HDR brachytherapy source due to increase of photoelectric interactions. Increase of atomic number and concentration of NPs and radial distance of tumor from the source increase DEF. Loading of the tumor volume with NPs during radiation therapy improves therapeutic ratio.

Keywords

References

1-Steel GG. Basic clinical radiobiology. 3rd ed.  London: Arnold; 2002.
2-Khan FM. The physics of radiation therapy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
3- Rose JH, Norman A, Ingram M, Aoki C, Solberg T, Mesa A. First radiotherapy of human metastatic brain tumors delivered by a computerized tomography scanner (CTRx). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;45(5):1127-32.
4-Herold DM, Das IJ, Stobbe CC, Iyer RV, Chapman JD. Gold microspheres: a selective technique for producing biologically effective dose enhancement. Int J Radiat Biol 2000;76(10):1357-64.
5- Santos Mello R, Callisen H, Winter J, Kagan AR, Norman A. Radiation dose enhancement in tumors with iodine. Med Phys 1983;10(1):75-8.
6-Cho SH. Estimation of tumour dose enhancement due to gold nanoparticles during typical radiation treatments: a preliminary Monte Carlo study. Phys Med Biol 2005;50(15):N163-73.
7-Hainfeld JF, Dilmanian FA, Slatkin DN, Smilowitz HM. Radiotherapy enhancement with gold nanoparticles. J Pharm Pharmacol 2008;60(8):977-85.
8-Sakamoto JH, Smith BR, Xie B, Rokhlin SI, Lee SC, Ferrari M.. The molecular analysis of breast cancer utilizing targeted nanoparticle based ultrasound contrast agents. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4(6):627–36.
9-Bullis K. Remotely activated nanoparticles destroy cancer. Technology Review 2007. Available From: http://www.technologyreview.com/Nanotech/17956/.  Accessed November 25, 2007.
10-Sullivan DC, Ferrari M. Nanotechnology and tumor imaging: seizing an opportunity. Mol Imaging 2004;3(4):364–9.
11-Zheng Y, Sanche L. Gold nanoparticles enhance DNA damage induced by anti-cancer drugs and radiation. Radiat Res 2009;172(1):114-9.
12-Hainfeld JF, Slatkin DN, Smilowitz HM. The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice. Phys Med Biol 2004;49(18): N309-15.
13-Zhang SX, Gao J, Buchholz TA, Wang Z, Salehpour MR, Drezek RA, et al. Quantifying tumor-selective radiation dose enhancements using gold nanoparticles: a monte carlo simulation study. Biomed Microdevices 2009;11(4):925-33.
14-Cho SH, Jones BL, Krishnan S. The dosimetric feasibility of gold nanoparticle-aided radiation therapy (GNRT) via brachytherapy using low-energy gamma-/x-ray sources. Phys Med Biol 2009;54(16):4889-905.
15-Van den Heuvel F, Locquet JP, Nuyts S. Beam energy considerations for gold nano-particle enhanced radiation treatment. Phys Med Biol 2010;55(16):4509–20.
16-Gual MR, Caridad M, Cardona A, Landy Y, González C, García JR. Use of nanoparticles in brachytherapy-an alternative for enhancing doses in cancer treatment. Proceedings of the International Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering; 2009 September 7 - 12; Munich, Germany.
17- Karaiskos P, Angelopoulos A, Sakelliou L, Sandilos P, Antypas C, Vlachos L, et al. Monte Carlo and TLD dosimetry of an 192Ir high dose-rate brachytherapy source. Med Phys 1998;25(10): 1975-84.
18- Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Ibbott GS, et al. Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys 2004;31(3):633-74.
19-Baltas D, Karaiskos P, Papagiannis P, Sakelliou L, Loeffler E, Zamboglou N. Beta versus gamma dosimetry close to Ir-192 brachytherapy sources. Med Phys 2001;28(9):1875-82.

20- Jones BL, Krishnan S, Cho SH. Estimation of microscopic dose enhancement factor around gold nanoparticles     by Monte Carlo calculations. Med Phys. 2010;37(7):3809-16.

Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal
Volume 12, Issue 3 - Serial Number 84
July and August 2013
Pages 313-324

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 December 2012
  • Revise Date: 07 June 2012
  • Accept Date: 11 February 2013

Share

How to cite

Statistics