Comparing of the Results of Transvaginal Ultrasonography with Dilatation and Curettage Findings in Evaluation of Endometrial Cancer in Women with Postmenopausal Bleeding

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Radiology.Department of Radiology. School of Medical Sciences, Department of Radiology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Resident in Radiology.Department of MRI, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Gynecology.Depatrment of Gynecology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objective: Postmenopausal vaginal bleeding (PMB) is a common and important clinical problem. PMB is caused by endometrial cancer in about 10% of patients. Most reports indicate that endometrial atrophy is the most common cause of PMB. Most of them for more evaluation are admitted for dilatation and curettage (D&C). The purpose of this study is to find in which patients, transvaginal ultrasonography(TVS) can replace with D&C?
Subjects and Methods: From April, 2008, through June, 2009, 98 women with PMB underwent TVS and histopathologic evaluation of the endometrium after D&C or after hysterectomy. Normal appearance at transvaginal sonography was defined as a thin (≤ 5 mm) and diffuse smooth with smoothly marginated and homogeneously echogenic endometrium. However a suspicious appearance was defined as either irregular thickening of the endometrium or an inhomogeneous endoluminal mass or pedunculated endoluminal mass or any endometrial thickness above 5 mm.
Results: At histologic examination: of 98 women, 44 (45%) had an atrophic endometrium, 11 (11%) had carcinoma, 10 (10%) had hyperplasia, 28 (29%) had polyps and 5 (5%) were others (ovarian tumor, leiomyosarcoma and multiple or giant leiomyoma) For carcinoma, the sensitivity of TVS was 100 %, specificity was 41.38 %, PPV was 17.4 %, and NPV was 100 % .In addition, the specificity of TVS for atrophic endometrium was 100 %.
Conclusion: TVS in patients with PMB is an excellent tool for the determination of whether further investigation with curettage or some form of endometrial biopsy is necessary and sensibly decreases the number of invasive methods. TVS also improves clinical decision- making, and the clinician’s diagnostic certainty.

Keywords

References

1-Gale A, Dey P. Postmenopausal bleeding. Menopause Int 2009;15(4):160-4.
2-Berek JS, editor.  Berek & Novak's gynecology. 14
th
ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. P. 313-49.
3-Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, editor. Diagnostic ultrasound. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. P. 1905–40.
4-Davidson KJ, Dubinsky TJ. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the endometrium in postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41(4):769-80.
5-Langlois JP, Nashelsky J. Clinical inquiries. How useful is ultrasound to evaluate patients with postmenopausal bleeding? J Fam Pract 2004;53(12):1005-6.
6-Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, Nygaard I. Danforth's Obstetrics & Gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. P. 181-90.
7-Medverd JR, Dubinsky TJ. Cost analysis model: US versus endometrial biopsy in evaluation of peri-and postmenopausal abnormal vaginal bleeding. Radiology 2002;222(3):619-27.  
8-Bree RL, Carlos RC. US for postmenopausal bleeding: consensus development and patient-centered outcomes. Radiology 2002;222(3):595-8.
9-Van den Bosch T, Vandendael A, Van Schoubroeck D, Wranz PA, Lombard CJ. Combining vaginal ultrasonography and office endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of endometrial disease in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85(3):349-52.
10-Epstein E, Valentin L. Managing women with post-menopausal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18(1):125-43.
Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal
Volume 11, Issue 3 - Serial Number 78
July and August 2017
Pages 229-240

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 February 2010
  • Revise Date: 09 April 2012
  • Accept Date: 11 June 2012

Share

How to cite

Statistics