The Evaluation of Dialysis Adequacy by KT/V in Hemodialysis Patients

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Nephrology.Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 General Practiotioner.Centre Responsible for Specific Patients in Khuzestan Province, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Nephrology.Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khorasan University of Medical Sciences,Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objective: Patients with ESRD need adequate dialysis. According to DOQI guidelines, minimum dialysis dose by KT/V in patients under hemodialysis (HD) is 1.2 or greater.
Subjects and Methods: In a cross- sectional study, we evaluated the value of KT/V among HD patients in shahid Beheshti Hospital of Abadan, Iran. HD was performed for 3 to 4 hours, using synthetic dialyzer and the bicarbonate- based dialysate. Blood flow rate, dialysate flow rate and ultrafiltration rate were 250 to 300 cc /min, 500cc/min and zero or 1 to 3 liters, respectively. Blood sampling for BUN was done immediately before and after the dialysis session.
We used the following equation to estimate the KT/V from the percent reduction in urea (PRU). KT/V = (0.026 ×PRU) – 0.460
Results: 54 HD patients (28 females and 26 males) with the mean age of 39 ± 14.2 years were enrolled in the study. The most common cause of ESRD was hypertension (24.07%) followed by, unknown (22.22%), DM (18.51%), Chronic Glomerulonephritis (14.81%), urinary tract abstraction (12.96%) and poly cystic kidney disease (7.40%).  KT/V was less than 1.2 in 87.03 patients (n=47). There was no significant difference in the valve of KT/V in men and women (P= 0.54) and in different hemoglobin concentration (p=0.58).
Conclusion: The results of the study show that the most of our HD patients have not received minimum dialysis dose and we should evaluate and correct its causes.

Keywords


1-Beladi Mousavi SS,  Hayati F, Alemzadeh Ansari MJ,Valavi E, Cheraghian B, Shahbazian H, et al. Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years in diabetic and nondiabetic patients on hemodialysis. Iran J Kidney Dis 2010;4:74-7.
2-United States Renal Data System. Excerpts from the USRDS 2008 annual data report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53:S116-117.
4-Murphy SW, Foley RN, Barrett BJ, Kent GM, Morgan J, Barree P, et al. Comparative mortality of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Canada. Kidney Int 2000;57:1720-6.
7-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations 2006 Updates Hemodialysis adequacy Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy Vascular Access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48:S1.
8-European best practice guidelines for haemodialysis (Part 1). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:25-31.
9-Culleton BF. Hemodialysis Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:S1-27.
11-Lowrie EG, Lew NL. The urea reduction ratio (URR). A simple method for evaluating hemodialysis treatment. Contemp Dial Nephrol 1992;12:11.
16-United States Renal Data System Excerpts from the USRDS 2000 annual data report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36:S127.
17-Morbidity and mortality of renal dialysis: an NIH consensus conference statement. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:62-70.
18-2007 Annual Report: ESRD clinical performance measures project. Am J Kidney Dis 2008;51:S1.
19-United States Renal Data System. Excerpts from the USRDS 2006 annual data report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2007;49:S1.
23-NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy. V. Hemodialysis dose troubleshooting. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:S42.
25-Beladi Mousavi SS, Tavazoe M, Hayati F, Sametzadeh M. Arterio-Venous fistula recirculation in hemodialysis: Causes and Prevalences. Iran J Kidney Dis 2010;11;219-24.