The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Adhered to Enamel Pretreated with Three Methods of CO2, Er, Cr:YSGG Lasers with Acid Phosphoric

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 1-Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences,Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Department of Pedodontics, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

3 Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

4 Endodontist.

Abstract

Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of CO2 and Er, Cr:YSGG Hydrokinetic lasers on enamel conditioning for bonding of brackets in comparison with acid etching technique.
Subjects and Methods: Ninety intact freshly preserved extracted premolars were chosen and divided into three groups (30 each). Then the teeth in acid etch group were conditioned with acid etching technique with 37% phosphoric acid and in CO2 group were conditioned with setting 3W (pps 150 mj ) using CO2  laser and in laser ErCr YSGG group were conditioned with setting 3W (pps 150 mj) using ErCr YSGG Hidrokiase  laser. Then 3M brackets were bonded to teeth by 3M light cure composite in each group.  For determination of bonding strength the samples were exposed to cutting force of 1 mm velocity per minute with universal testing machine. Descriptive and t test were used for comparison between groups with P<0.05 level of significance.
Results: The mean values of bonding strengths to MP were as follows: for acid etching technique 11.3, laser CO2 technique 8.8, laser ErCr YSGG Hidrokinetic technique 9.5. The highest value of bonding strength, although statistically insignificant, was in acid etch group.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that use of laser conditioning enamel surface treatment produced less bonding strength in comparison with acid etching, but its difference was not significant. Moreover, the high SD (Variations- standard deviation) seen in both laser groups compared with acid etch group, makes questionable the reliability and predictability of laser-etching method. Further studies on clinical application of laser are still needed.

Keywords


1-Graber M.  Orthodontics, current principles & Technique. Laser in orthodontics. In: St Louis. The CV .3th ed. Philadelphia: mosby; 2012; P. 72-1051.                                 
2-Swift EJ Jr, Edwards GS,  Perdigao J. free electron laser etching of dental enamel . J  Dent 2001; 29(5): 347-353.
3-Fuhrmann R, Gutknecht N, magunski A. Conditioning of enamel with ND: YAG and Co2 dental laser systems and with phosphoric acid An in- vitro comparison of the tensile bone strength and the morphology of the enamel. J  Orofac Orthop  2001; 62(5) : 375-86.
4-Serdar U, Metin O, Aslihan U. laser etching of enamel for direct bonding with an Er, cr: YSGG hydrokinetic laser system . Am J Orthod Denthofacial Orthop 2002Dec; 122(6): 649-56.
5-Kown YH, Kwon OW, Kim HI. ND: YAG laser ablation of enamel for orthodontic use : tensile  bond strength and surface modification. Dent Mater J 2003 Sep; 22(3): 397-403.
6-Nikita VL, Vidya BS,Sham SB. Disinfection methods of extracted human teeth. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2007; 1(2): 27-29
7-Varma B, Tandon S. Enamel etching by Carnon dioxid laser. An in- vitro comparative evaluation. Indian J Dent Res 1997Jan – Mar; 8(1): 19-25.
 8-Carpus – Pastor L, Villalba Moreno J, DE Dios Lopes Gonzalez. Comparing the tensile strength  of brackets adhered to laser etched enamel vs. acid – etched enamel. J. Am Dent Assoc1997 Jun; 128(6); 732-7.
9-Martinez – Insua A, Da Silva Dominguez L, Rivera FG. Differences in bonding to acid – etched  or ER: YAG- laser – treated enamel and dentin surface. J Prosthet Dent 2000 Sep; 84(3): 280-8.
10-Swift EJ Jr, Edwards GS , Perdigao J. free electron laser etching of dental enamel . J Dent 2001 Jul; 29(5): 347-353.
11-Human tooth enamel and their probable effects on solubility.  Calcif tissue Int 1986; 38: 197-208.
12-Fuhrmann R, Gutknecht N, magunski A. Conditioning of enamel with ND: YAG and Co2 dental laser systems and with phosphoric acid An in- vitro comparsion of the tensile bone strength and the morphology of the enamel. J Orofac Orthop 2001 Sep; 62(5): 375-86.
13-Usumez S, Orhan M, Usumez A. Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding with an Er, Cr: YSGG hydrokinetic laser system. Am J Orthod dentofacial  orthop 2002 Dec; 122(6): 649-56.
14-Goldstein RE , Parkins  FM . Using air-abrasive technology to diagnose and restore pit and fissure caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 760-61. 
15-Dana C, Thresiamma J, Kuriakose S , Jayasree S. Surface treatment of enamel with laser – a potential alternative for acid etching –an invitro study. J Indian Soc. Pedod prev Dent 1996 Jun; 14(2): 62-5.
16-Lee BS, jsish TT, Lwee YL. Bond strengths of orthodontic bracket after acid – etched , Er: YAG laser- irradiated and Comtoined treatment on enamel surface. Angle Orthod  2003 Oct; 73(5): 565-70 .
17-Kown YH, Kwon OW, Kim HI. ND: YAG laser ablation of enamel for orthodontic use : tensile  bond strength and surface modification. Dent Mater J 2003 Sep; 22(3): 397-403.
18-White LW. Glass Ionomer Cement. J Clin Ortho 1989; 20: 387-91.              
19-Maijer R, Smith DC. Crystal growth on outer enamel surface: An alternative to acid etching: A J Ortho 1986; 89: 183-93.
20-Armengol V, Laboux O, Weiss P. Effect of ER: YAG and ND:YAG laser irradiation on the surface roughness and free surface engery of enamel and dentine: an invitro study Oper Dent. 2003 Jan – feb; 28(1): 67-74.
21-Germec D, Cakan U, Ozdemir FI, Aru Tn, cakan M. Shear bond stength of barackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives. Eur J orthod 2009; 31: 207-212.