Clinical Efficacy and Marginal Adaptation of Cavities Restored with Composite Tetric N- Ceram Bulk Fill by Two Conventional LED Devices and LED Third Generation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Operative.Department of Operative, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Resident of Operative.Department of Operative, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

3 Resident of Orthodontic.Department of Orthodontic, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor of Operative.Department of Operative, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical

Abstract

Background and Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the marginal adaptation of Ttric N-Ceram Bulk Fill Filled restorations with two curing units: conventional full name (LED) and third generation LED.
Subjects and Methods: Sixty premolar teeth divided in 4 groups (n=15) Standardizes cavies prepared in one proximal Surface of teeth. Cavities restored with two posterior composites; Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill and photo core. Each composite cured with a conventional LED curing unit and a third generation of LED curing unit. The adhesive applied to all groups was single Bond 2. The restored ns were aged and stored in fushin. After sectioning, dye penetration was investigated under the stereomicroscope (scale -0-3*25). man Whitney and Krustal-Wallis tests were used to analyzed the data (p

Keywords

References

1-Scientific Documentation Tetric®N-Ceram Bulk Fill. Ivoclar Vivadent. Online. available at: www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zoolu.../Tetric+N-Ceram+Bulk+Fill. accessed  jan 3, 2013.

2-De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, "et al". A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005Feb; 84(2): 118-32.
3-Burke F, Crisp RJ, James A, Mackenzie L, Pal A, Sands P, "et al". Two year clinical evaluation of a low-shrink resin composite material in UK general dental practices. Dent Mater 2011 Jul;27(7):622-30.
4-Min SH, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of shrinkage strain, modulus, and instrument compliance on polymerization shrinkage stress of light-cured composites during the initial curing stage. Dent Mater 2010Oct; 26(10): 1024-33.
5-BagisY, Baltacioglu I, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities. Oper Dent 2009Sep-Oct; 34(5): 578-85.
6-Shivakumar K, Prasad S, Chandu G. International Caries Detection and Assessment System: A new paradigm in detection of dental caries. J Conserv Dent 2009Jan-Mar; 12(1): 10-18.
7-Damineni R. An In vitro Evaluation of Microleakage of cavit restoration in Complex endodontic access cavities. Inter J Contemporary Dent 2012; 3(1):  76-85.
8-CLEARFIL PHOTO CORE Brochure. KURARY. Online. available at: http://kuraraydental.com/product/core-build-up/clearfil-photo-core. Accessed  may3, 2013.
9-He Z, shimada Y , Tagami J. the effectsof cavity size and incremental technique on micro tensile bond strength of resin composite in class I cavities . Dent Mater 2007May; 23(5): 533-8.
10-van ende A de munck J, van landuyt kl , poitevin  A, peumans M, van Meerbeek b. bulk – filling of high c- factor posterior cavities :Effect on adhesion to cavity- bottom dentin. Dent Mater 2013Mar; 29(3): 269-77.
11-sirin karaarslan E, yildiz E, cebe m, yegin z, oaturk B. Evaluation of micro – tensile bond strength of caries – affected human dentine after three different caries removal techniques. J Dent 2012Oct; 40(10): 793-801.
12-lllie N, schooner c, bucher k, hickel r. An in – vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk – fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. J Dent 2014Jul; 42(7): 850-5.
13-Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013Jan; 17(1): 227-35.
14-Duarte Jr S, Saad J. Marginal adaptation of Class 2 adhesive restorations. Quintessence Int 2008May; 39(5): 413-9.
15-Yamazaki P, Bedran-Russo A, Pereira P, Swift Jr E. Microleakage evaluation of a new low-shrinkage composite restorative material. Oper Dent 2006 Nov-Dec; 31(6): 670-6.
16-campos EA ardu s  ld, jasse ff, bortolotto t, krejci l. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk – fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42(5): 575-81.
17-Furness A, Tadros My , looney sw , Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk / incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk - fill composites. J Dent 2014Apr; 42 (4): 439-49.
Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal
Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 101
May and June 2016
Pages 179-186

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 February 2016
  • Revise Date: 24 February 2016
  • Accept Date: 08 March 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics