The Effect of the Sensory Information and Age on the Transition of the Relative Phase in Bimanual Coordination Pattern

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior,Department of Motor Behavior, Sport Science Faculty, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Associated Professor of Motor Behavior,Department of Motor Behavior, Sport Science Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objective:Integration and interpret of sensory feedback helps to performing of bimanual coordination tasks. The purpose of present research was to study of the effect of sensory information and age differences on the transition of the relative phase in bimanual coordination task.
Subjects and Methods:Fifteen male young adults (25±3.9 y) and 15 male elder (66.06±6.12 y), all of whom right-handed, were selected by available sampling method. Participants started performing the task with bimanual coordination device with anti-phase pattern at frequency 0.75 Hz which was increased by 0.25 Hz in 5-seconds steps and as far as the transition occurred toward in-phase pattern. The final frequency considered was at 5 Hz. The task was performed under 8 sensory conditions. Data analyzed by mixed analysis of variance with repeated measures and paired-samples t-test with Bonferroni correction for pair comparisons of the interaction effects.
Results: The findings revealed that main effects of senses and group and also the interaction effects between vision-audition, vision-proprioception, audition-proprioception and audition-group were significant (P

Keywords

References

1-Haken H, Kelso JAS, Bunz H. A Theoretical-Model of Phase-Transitions in Human Hand Movements. Biol Cybern. 1985; 51(5):347-356.
2-de Oliveira CS. The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Psychol . 2002; 110:139–159.
3-Aramaki Y, Honda M, Okada T and Sadato N. Neural Correlates of the Spontaneous Phase Transition during Bimanual Coordination. Cereb Cortex. 2006; 16:1338-1348.
4-Beek PJ, Peper CE, Daffertshofer A. Modeling rhythmic interlimb coordination: Beyond the Haken–Kelso–Bunz model. Brain Cognition. 2002; 48:149-165.
5-de Boer BJ, Peper CE, Beek PJ. Frequency-induced changes in interlimb inter-actions: increasing manifestations of closed-loop control. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 220:202–14.
6-Peper C(L.)E, Ridderikhoff A, Daffertshofer A, Beek PJ. Explanatory limitations of the HKB model: Incentives for a two-tiered model of rhythmic interlimb coordination. Hum Movement Sci. 2004; 23:673-697.
7-Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning. 4thed. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetic; 2005.
8-Jackson GM, Jackson SR ,Newport R, Harvey M. coordination of bimanual movements in centrally deafferented patient executing open loop reach-to-grasp movements. Acta Psychol. 2002; 110:231-46.
9-Takeuchi N, Oouchida Y, Izumi SI. Motor Control and Neural Plasticity through nterhemispheric Interactions. Neural Plast. 2012; 2012: 1-13.
10-Reuter-Lorenz PA, Stanczak L. Differential effects of aging on the functions of the corpus callosum.Dev Neuropsychol. 2000; 18(1):113–137.
11-Greene LS Williams HG. Aging and coordination from the dynamic pattern perspective. 1996; In A.M. Ferrandez & N. Teasdale (Eds.). Changes in sensory and motor behavior in aging. (pp. 89–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12-Serrien DJ, Steyvers M, Debaere F, Stelmach GE Swinnen SP. Bimanual coordination and limb-specific parameterization in patients with Parkinson''s disease. 2000; Neuropsychologia. 38 (13):1714-1722.
13-Wishart LR, Lee TD, Murdoch JE Hodges NJ. Effects of Aging on Automatic and Effortful Processes in Bimanual Coordination. J Gerontol: Psychol Sci. 2000; 55B, P85–P94.
14-Lee TD, Wishart LR Murdoch JE. Aging, Attention, and Bimanual Coordination. Can J Aging. 2002; 21(4):549-557. 
15-Bangert AS, Lorenz PA, Walsh Schachter CM, Seidler RD. Bimanual coordination and aging: Neurobehavioral implications. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48:1165–70.
16-Grillo E, Almeida Q, Lee T Verdolini AK. Do vision and audition influence bimanual timing coordination for in-phase and anti-phase patterns in a linear slide task? The open sports science journal. 2010; 3:105-110.
17-Zanone PG, Kelso JAS. Evolution of Behavioral Attractors with Learning -Nonequilibrium Phase-Transitions. J Exp Psychol Human. 1992; 18(2):403-421.
18-Kelso JAS. Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1995.
19-Baldissera F, Cavallari P, Marini G, Tassone G. Differential Control of in-Phase and Antiphase Coupling of Rhythmic Movements of Ipsilateral Hand and Foot. Exp Brain Res. 1991; 83(2):375-380.
20-Fling BW, Christine M, Walsh Banger AS, Lorenz PA, Welsh RC, et al. Differential callosal contributions to bimanual control in young and older adults. J Cognitive Neurosci. 2011; 23(9):2171-85.
21-Liederman J. The dynamics of interhemispheric collaboration and bemispheric control. Brain Cognition. 1998; 36:193-208.
22- Schöner G, Kelso JAS. Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Sci. 1998c; 239:1513-1520.
23-Farsi AR, Vaez Mousavi MK, Norouzi E. The effects of speed and sensory feedbacks interference on perform in-phase and anti-phase patterns of bimanual coordination. In press; Motor development and learning. (In Persian).
24-Blais M, Martin E, Albaret JM, Tallet J. Preservation of perceptual integration improves temporal stability of bimanual coordination in the elderly: An evidence of age-related brain plasticity. Behav Brain Res. 2014; 275:34–42.
25-Steyvers M, Verschueren SMP, Levin O, Ouamer M, Swinnen SP. Proprioceptive control of cyclical bimanual forearm movements across different movement frequencies as revealed by means of tendon vibration. Exp Brain Res. 2001; 140:326–334.
26-Radovanovic S, Korotkov A, Ljubisavljevic M, Lyskov E, Thunberg J, Kataeva G, et al. Comparison of brain activity during different types of proprioceptive inputs: A positron emission tomography study. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 143:276–285.
27-Wenderoth N, Debaere F, Swinnen SP. Neural networks involved in cyclical interlimb coordination as revealed by medical imaging techniques. 2004b. In: Neurobehavioral determinants of interlimb coordination: a multidisciplinary approach. (Swinnen SP, Duysens J, eds), pp 127–222. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
28-Heuninckx S, Debaere F, Wenderoth N, Verschueren S, Swinnen SP. Ipsilateral coordination deficits and central processing requirements associated with coordination as a function of aging. J. Gerontol B. Psychol. Sci Soc Sci. 2004; 59:225–232.
29-Carrasco M, Ling S, Read S. Attention alters appearance. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7:308 –313.
30- Guerreiro MJS, Murphy DR, Van Gerven PWM. The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: A critical review and a renewed view. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136:975–1022.
31-Verschueren SM, Swinnen SP, Cordo PJ, Dounskaia NV. Proprioceptive control of multijoint movement: unimanual circle drawing. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 127:171–181.
32-Spencer RMC, Ivry RB, Cattaert D, Semjen A. Bimanual coordination during rhythmic movements in the absence of somatosensory feedback. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(4):2901-2910.
33-Temprado JJ, Vercruysse S, Salesse R, Berton E. A dynamic systems approach to the effects of aging on bimanual coordination. Gerontol. 2009; 56:335–44.
Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal
Volume 15, Issue 6 - Serial Number 105
January and February 2017
Pages 619-633

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 October 2016
  • Revise Date: 05 January 2017
  • Accept Date: 25 January 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics